B

B

C

 Watch 24
 
 Page 2   (of 5)

The Gaucho Club                     The over paid moguls rarely venture outside of London (or even the Gaucho Club) commission programs from each other and are insulated from real life.   It is still hard to understand why opposition parties and civil society did not more vigorously oppose the use of taxpayers' money to subsidise a self-perpetuating class of ideologues promoting such one-sided views.
Clearly these people  are out of touch with the real world. 

BBC banked £106,000 of Children in Need phone-in cash

The BBC has admitted that it banked £106,000 that should have gone to causes such as Children in Need and Comic Relief in the latest phone-in scandal to affect the corporation.
Viewers who contacted fundraising phone-ins but whose calls were received just after the lines had closed were still charged for the call and a BBC subsidiary kept the money.
Sir Michael Lyons, Chairman of the BBC Trust, which uncovered the practice, expressed regret for what he described as “a failure in terms of the behaviour of staff and of the BBC’s own systems”. He added: “This did not help the BBC or the people we serve.”

John Simpson hits out at BBC's 'bikini' values

The BBC's most senior reporter has criticised the corporation for dumbing down its current affairs programmes, predicting the news would soon by read by "someone in a bikini" or "from Strictly Come Dancing".
John Simpson, who has hit out at plans by BBC director general Mark Thompson to make significant cuts to BBC news services, told the audience at the Cheltenham Literature Festival that values at the broadcaster were changing.
"It wouldn't surprise me to see people doing the job of newsreader wearing bikinis or from Strictly Come Dancing," he said. The public is changing.
"The hold the BBC has on young people is not the same. They don't mind adverts. Sometimes they like adverts better than the programmes."
The BBC's world affairs editor also joked that he feared his career would end in the Blue Peter garden, the final resting place of some of the programme's pets.
"I expect sooner or later I'll be taken out into the Blue Peter garden, given a lethal injection and buried."
Mr Simpson's made his remarks in defiance of a recent warning to presenters from BBC chairman Sir Michael Lyons against criticising the corporation, and its planned budget cuts, in public.

 

He blamed the weakness of its management for failing to stand up to attacks from the Government that were destroying the BBC's role as "the world's most powerful, free-standing, independent broadcaster".
Under a licence fee settlement, the BBC must make cuts of £2 billion over the next six years.
It is estimated as many as 2,800 jobs could go as a result, with flagship programmes such as Planet Earth and BBC News bearing the brunt.
Mr Thompson has called 100 of the corporation's biggest names to a meeting this Wednesday, when the package of cuts will be signed off by the BBC Trust.
Mr Simpson has worked for the BBC for more than 40 years. He joined the corporation in 1966 as a trainee sub-editor in Radio News.
His comments may contain a veiled reference to Natasha Kaplinsky's recent defection to Channel Five.
The presenter of the BBC's Six O'Clock News, whose profile soared after she won Strictly Come Dancing in 2004, quit the BBC to become the face of Five news.

THE BBC CAUGHT RED HANDED DOCTORING GLOBAL WARMING STORY                                  If you weren’t skeptical about the media before, you might be after this, especially the story about the BBC. After pressure by enviro-freaks, the BBC actually gave in and changed the facts to suit them!
Jeremy Paxman has accused the BBC of hypocrisy over climate change, saying it takes a "high moral tone" in its reporting of the issue while at the same time pursuing environmentally irresponsible policies.
 

     
 
Page 3   (of 5)
 

 

                  An everyday tale of Rip Off merchants, using your job at the BBC and cashing in on the character you play to make you a bit  on the side.

Senior figures from the Radio 4 soap, including the shows editor, accepted an offer of free trips around the Mediterranean, North Africa and Norway in exchange for       entertaining passengers on Archers themed cruises. It cost Fans more than £1400 each to meet the cast members. In the BBC editorial guidelines it forbids employees from accepting free-bees as well as exploiting the BBC and its characters for commercial gain.

The BBC's own editorial guidelines state: "We [the BBC] must not endorse or appear to endorse any other organisation, its products, activities or services." They add: "We will not normally allow the BBC name, logos, titles, channel names, programme titles, formats or characters to be used by commercial advertisers."

But the highlight of the voyage is undoubtedly No Place Like Gnome, a specially-written episode of the show which will be performed by members of the cast and passengers.
The cast and crew also co-host an onboard cocktail party with the ship's captain and sign autographs.

A BBC spokes woman said the cruises were licensed by BBC Worldwide and therefore in keeping with BBC rules.

 

BBC chief spends £40,000 on flights and hotels
 

Figures, released by the BBC under the Freedom of Information Act reveal Mr Thompson has been abroad 26 times since taking over at the helm of the corporation in 2004.
 Mark Thompson, the director-general of the BBC, has spent more than £40,000 on flights and hotel bills since taking up his post include a visit to the Cannes Film Festival, stopping off at the Masters Golf Tournament in Augusta, Georgia, and visiting the Athens Olympics

 

In 2006, director general Mark   Thompson saw his pay packet increase by £160,000 from £459,000 to £619,000.

BBC staff are currently fighting Mr Thompson's own proposals to slash more than 1,800 jobs The BBC was unable to provide a full breakdown of the costs of all Mr Thompson's overseas trips, but it has been able to disclose details of flights worth just over £37,000 and hotel rooms costing just over £6,000. In April it spent just over £3,350 on two flights to Augusta and New York so Mr Thompson could attend the Masters golf tournament and a series of staff meetings.

 

 

 

 


In June he flew to Paris and Banff
at a cost to the licence-payer of £4,729. Mr Thompson's most expensive set of flights took place in September 2006, when he flew to Seattle, San José and San Francisco at a cost of just over £5,100.
Hotels used by Mr Thompson include the five-star Ciragan Palace, in Istanbul, which cost £762 for a two-night stay.         The BBC has declined to provide details of two trips made by Mr Thompson to the Middle East in 2007, which related to the kidnapped BBC reporter Alan Johnson.
It has also refused to provide detailed information relating to trips to India, the United States and Belgium, all of which were made by Mr Thompson last year.

BBC 'Fat Cats' in row over bonuses A row has erupted over executive pay at the BBC after details of the Executive Board’s remuneration were revealed in the Corporation’s annual report, published today.
BBC bosses received annual bonuses of nearly 25 per cent of their salaries last year, despite thousands of workers facing the prospect of redundancy as the Corporation attempts to trim its £3.8 billion budget.
The report revealed that 13 members of the executive board, including Mark Byford,
(pictured here) the deputy director general, received payments in addition to their salaries totalling £546,000 in the last financial year. The average salary among the BBC’s 27,000 staff is £38,000.
News of the bonuses - up more than 2 per cent on the previous year - prompted outrage among union leaders and led to calls for executives to return the money.
 

     
 
Page 4   (of 5)

 How the BBC Spends Your Money

The BBC today unveils plans for its future which could include 2,500 job cuts and the possible sell-off of Television Centre. But where does the money from our licence fee go?

As well as the job losses, which are expected to fall most heavily on news and the factual division, the plans include a 10 per cent cut in the number of programmes actually commissioned by the The BBC today unveils plans for its future which could include 2,500 job cuts and the possible sell-off of Television Centre. But where does the money from our licence fee go?

As well as the job losses, which are expected to fall most heavily on news and the factual division, the plans include a 10 per cent cut in the number of programmes actually commissioned by the BBC. This will lead to more repeats on television.

Director general Mark Thompson received unanimous backing for the plans by the BBC Trust yesterday, although staff attacked the trustees for "rubber stamping" cutbacks.

BBC Trust chairman Sir Michael Lyons said: "After six months of very detailed work by the management and rigorous testing and challenge from the BBC Trust, we are confident that the plans we have approved today will safeguard the core values of the BBC at a time of radical and accelerating change in technology, markets and audience expectations."                                In 2005/6, 30.8 per cent of programmes shown on BBC 1 were repeats, with 8.9 per cent repeats in peak time.
2007 estimates show increases of at least 15%

 

 Andrew Marr    Jane Garvey  Jeremy Paxman

 

How the fee breaks down  

 The monthly cost of the licence fee (£10.96) can be broken down as follows:

  • £7.54 goes on eight national TV channels, including BBC1, BBC2 and regional programmes.
  • £1.17 goes on the 10 national radio stations, which cover music, news and sport.
  • £1.01 is the cost of broadcasting all TV and radio output, and the cost of collecting the licence fee from 25 million homes.
  • 75p covers the 40 local radio stations.
  • 49p is spent on the 240 bbc.co.uk websites.
The BBC World Service is funded by Government grant and not the TV licence.

 

 

 

 

 

RIP OFF BBC.

I'm sure you have seen the news that the BBC is facing a record fine of up to £250,000 after repeatedly ripping off licence fee payers on a string of shows. It's expected to receive its biggest ever sanction when Ofcom rules on its faking of competition winners on a number of programmes. Viewers on shows including Children in Need, Comic Relief and Sport Relief were all duped.         Production staff were found to have made up names of winners and even posed as contestants. The regulator, which will rule on 12 cases, will not give the BBC any special favours. An Ofcom spokesman said: "Whether publicly funded or not the same rigorous high standards apply to all." The fine will almost certainly be a record and the maximum £250,000 censure is thought to be under serious consideration. Now I do understand that other TV broadcasters were at the same sordid scam but then again no other broadcaster forces us to fund their activities.

Given the years of BBC crowing   about how much good work it does for charity, this recognition of a lack of control over how production staff operates rather blinds Pudsey in the other eye. How can we trust them when they have shown they cannot regulate their own standards?

     
 
Page 5   (of 5)
 THE new Victims Commission announced in the Stormont Assembly on Monday, 28 January, will be made up of four commissioners, among them Patricia McBríde, the sister of IRA Volunteer Antoin Mac Giolla Bhride, who was killed on active service by the SAS in December 1984.

Photo: The four Victims Commissioners, Brendan McAllister, Bertha McDougall, Mike Nesbitt and Patricia McBride

MISSING WORDS. It's not what the BBC says in its reports, it often what it leaves out. For example, in this report on the Northern Ireland portal it factually reports certain changes regarding the constitution of a Victim's Commission. Fair enough. It then blithely states concerning the members of this quango that amongst them is "Patricia MacBride, whose brother was killed by the SAS and whose father died 17 months after being shot by loyalists." It fails to explain that Patricia MacBrides' brother was killed by the SAS because he was an IRA terrorist stopped before he could carry out a bombing and that her father was murdered by loyalist terrorists. The BBC is indirectly equating the actions of the SAS to those of the IRA, and it is also besmirching the reputation of law abiding loyalists by failing to make it clear that it was loyalist terror gangs that murdered Patricia McBrides father. This is the shameful equivocation at which the BBC excels. Just one sentence with missing words.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  Former BBC producer Rod Liddle's column in today's Sunday Times is a cracking read from end to end, echoing so much of what we have said and discussed here for so long. Particular highlights of his article, BBC in need, sub-headed "Poor old Auntie Beeb is unwell. She’s confused and no longer knows right from wrong, truth from fakery", include:
Management surprise at management ignorance:

Much to the apparent surprise of Bennett and Abramsky, two experienced and highly respected corporation bureaucrats, a procession of contrite and nervous producers came forward to ’fess up. The public, it seemed, had been deceived with unnerving consistency, particularly over programmes with phone-in polls and competitions. And on the corporation’s most noble flagship enterprises, too. Comic Relief and Children in Need, for example.
“We just sat there absolutely stunned,” one executive board member told me, “shocked beyond belief. Nobody had any idea that this was going on on such a scale.”
Not even Bennett and Abramsky, when they asked for producers to come forward?
“Nobody. Nobody at all. And we had the very powerful sense that there was a lot more to come. And we thought this time no excuses, something really has to be done.”
 

 


The week the BBC revealed that it had misled viewers
in a wildlife documentary called Incredible Animal Journeys broadcast in May. The programme claimed to show Steve Leonard, the presenter, tracking the migration of a pregnant caribou via a GPS receiver from a hotel room in the Yukon. In fact, the scenes were “reconstructed” several weeks later in the UK.
The broadcaster was only rumbled after an eagle-eyed viewer spotted a British electrical socket in the background

The awful waste of an awful lot of cash on the awful Jonathan Woss:
“The BBC was burbling with happiness because it had got Jonathan Ross for ‘only’ £18m when he had asked for £24m,” the senior BBC journalist remarked with some derision. “He draws only about 3m viewers every week – for which he is paid almost eight times the entire yearly budget for a programme like The World Tonight. How can that possibly be justified?”
Privately quite a few BBC executives admit that the Ross contract was a misjudgment, politically, morally and practically. One told me it had cost the BBC “a couple of hundred million quid” when it came to charter renewal because the politicians were ill-disposed towards an organisation that could be so cavalier with licence-payers’ money.


 

     
This page is specifically intended to highlight the many ways that the BBC  manipulates veiwers and listeners under the guise of impartiallity by selective reporting and intervews with people (selected public) in order to make you think, you too should feel, like they do.
Observational Comment on the increasing political bias and persistent watering down of the 9pm water shed the BBC charter and its' ethical requirement
With contributions from members, news media, political commentators and other publications.

To make your comments regarding this page please visit our Contact Us page              .

 [Return to News Page]    
From The Archers to the Director General your money and the BBC 

www.bbcwatch.co.uk

The BBC’s Charter and its Producers Guidelines state that the BBC shall…
• “…contain comprehensive, authoritative and impartial coverage of news and current affairs in the United Kingdom and throughout the world…”


• “…treat controversial subjects with due accuracy and impartiality… and…not contain any material expressing the opinion of the corporation…”


• “…Due impartiality lies at the heart of the BBC. All programs and services should be open minded, fair and show a respect for truth…The BBC applies due impartiality to all its broadcasting and services, both to domestic and international audiences…”

 

  Edited text from bbc watch       
The BBC consistently fails to adhere to its legal obligations to produce impartial and accurate reporting. Our systematic, objective and rigorous research points to the firm conclusion that the BBC frequently displays marked and consistent pro-Palestinian bias in their coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute. Their inability to report on this subject in an impartial way raises questions over their ability to report on all other politically sensitive issues.

 

The British public continues to pay for this unfair, partial and inaccurate news service through the license fee. We wonder whether it is healthy for Britain’s democracy that such huge public funds should be provided to what is an essentially monopolistic and unaccountable body. If the BBC cannot provide impartial news coverage it has no legitimate call on public funds simply to promote its own prejudices.

 

British Bias Corporation

         
The book includes profiles of the BBCs' senior management, almost all of whom have long-standing connections with leftwing media like The Guardian and with the Labour Party. The BBCs' overwhelming support for the European Union is revealed in chapter five.
The "despised tribes" of the BBC are discussed next. They are Ulster Protestants, Conservative Christians and the Roman Catholic Church in particular, most Americans and all those that the organization considers to be "right-wing." There was also a strong bias in favour of the IRA , debate on immigration, the Middle East, Islam and other uncomfortable issues are avoided. There is no doubt that the BBC is contributing to the alarming spread of anti-Semitism worldwide.
Like all leftists, those at the BBC believe that their moral values are superior and not to be questioned. Chapter eight provides detailed evidence of how far they will go to twist, lie and distort in order to mislead the public. 
Continue --4